Pretty soon I will have to use one of my 900 word syndicated pieces to address this but let me just say it this way.

If an evangelical Christian votes for Barack Obama - he/she is voting against the biblical doctrines, precepts, and instructions on:

1. Protecting the innocent
2. Feeding the hungry
3. Helping the poor
4. Defining the family
5. Defending the helpless
6. Assisting with murder (down's syndrome babies in particular)
7. Biblical doctrine of work
8. Self Responsibility
9. Encouraging the engagement of immorality
10. Parental responsibilities
11. And worldview matters...

Sex ed for 5 year olds, Death by starvation and neglect of Down's syndrome babies, Government theft and redistribution of earned resources you need to feed your family, FOCA (Abortion Act to overturn every limit on abortion ever passed), replacing a mom and a dad with two daddies/mommies, mandating of condoms - and prevention of the teaching of biblical sexual practice...

You get the picture...

"Religious people" in name only may vote for Barack, but Believers can not - because he stands opposed to what the Bible defines as genuine believers.

This is utterly inappropriate, immoral, and unsafe?

It was released by the Democrats and the information inside included - Home Addresses, Social Security Number, and home phone number.

Politico had obtained the full file and have since adjusted what they are making available publicly on their website.

But the full file as obtained by the news site - included many personal details.

UPDATE: More sickening liberal pile-on. The New York Times made up facts in reporting at least ONE of the stories they ran on Palin.

Disgusting!

On the night when the Messiah spoke, and the crowd swooned. Obama's Chicago goons were on a mission to shut down a journalist who was telling the complete story of Obama's connection to William Ayers.

If you'd like to hear it for yourself - as Stanley Kurtz told Chicago radio just click here.

Did Hillary just attempt to secure her spot on the United States Supreme Court? Perhaps so. In one of the most unsurprising moments in the convention - given that the plan had been leaked to the media since SUNDAY that she would do it - Hillary Clinton called for the suspension of the count, and the affirmation of Barack Obama to be the nominee by voice vote.

She had more votes cast for her.

She had more supporters, and depending on how Florida and Michigan would've gone in the actual count, she could have had more votes on the floor at the convention.

Knowing that Hillary doesn't do anything without triangulating something out of the deal for herself, one has to wonder - WHAT did she get?

And WHEN does she get it?

History in the making indeed, but isn't it sad - that it wasn't done the way every other Democratic nominee has been nominated in this brief century - or the previous?


Even when I was the first pundit to predict that Obama would be the nominee - I never believed it would come down to hi-jinx, smoke-filled rooms, and the promise of Hillary looming large in the Supreme Court's future...

It's actually a pretty slimy way for a man who is a descendant of several races to be back-doored into the nomination...

10 generic mentions of Obama, and all of them attached to her own accomplishments. She toted him around like Paris Hilton does her purse puppy.

She also rubbed his nose in his poo and put him back in his cage.

Hillary showed to the world tonight quite likely why she might have HAD more actual votes in the Democratic primary than Obama did. But aside from a couple of glancing blows (not head on collisions) on the "possible policies" of John McCain she did nothing to help her ticket at all.

Look its easy to come out and repeat the written script from the teleprompter that says "I support Barack Obama."

But in very Clintonian style and ease, Hillary just set herself up for the 2012 run when she very covertly helps the Obamas NOT make history in 2008.

End of story...

Because it may well be too complicated for him to know for sure. And granted he believes it would be a decision above his pay-grade... so he needs your help.

Does THIS GIRL HERE deserve to live, or to even be pronounced alive?

By his own belief about morality - Barack is unsure...

By his own belief on children who are born he would have legislated death... and lied about it.

"The primaries proved that Americans care deeply about the faith, values, character and leadership convictions of candidates as much as they do about the issues. While I know both men as friends and they recognize I will be frank, but fair, they also know I will be raising questions in these four areas beyond what political reporters typically ask. This includes pressing issues that are bridging divides in our nation, such as poverty, HIV/AIDS, climate and human rights."

Now - I'm not sure what Warren believes he is referring to in the "four areas beyond what political reporters typically ask" but I will tell you that the four things he's listed do not qualify. Primarily because these are four of the MOST OFTEN asked about "areas."

And is Rick Warren seriously going to discuss 'Global Warming' - despite the fact that 2008 has been a wrecking ball from the science community to the theory that Al Gore enriched himself off of? Seriously? More than 50,000 climatologists, meteorologists, and earth scientists - not to mention prominent, classroom isolated, academic science types ALL now refuting the key components to the overly hyped theory? So overly hyped now that the British public school system is not allowed to show the Gore film without disclaiming as entirely propaganda? What does this have to do with a "faith and values" conference?

Warren has also consistently NEVER spared the opportunity to allow Obama to preach his Gospel of Condoms, and to date he's also not disputed it.

But has Warren seen the PEPFAR legislation (emergency aid to Africa for aids relief) that the Congress these two Senators belong to have been working on in recent weeks? Does he know about the abortive language fight that ensued over the 'Global Fund' using U.S. dollars from our emergency HIV/AIDS aid to perform mandated abortions?

Will Warren allow groups like Compassion International to share the stage this year and speak about  the work they are actually doing in the pandemic regions of Africa, bringing children HIV/AIDS cocktail meds AND the gospel of Jesus Christ - as opposed to the gospel of prophylactics?

What this conference really does is allow Rick Warren another notch in the belt of his "reach, influence, and power." Something he has become accustomed to with no measurable, tangible results to show for all the money spent in holding this annual soiree'.